Mixed bag
1.
Force of habit
A mixed bag of stuff in this November blog, running a bit
late. The reason for both the mixed bag and the late arrival is that I fear I
am running out of things to say. It did, however, occur to me to talk about how
I, and possibly you, do things in ways that are suboptimal, just because that
is always the way we have done them.
Let’s give a very simple example. As I mentioned in a
previous blog, first thing in the morning, Linda and I tend to watch the repeat
of yesterday afternoon’s Countdown on the telly. There we are, sitting on the
settee in our dressing gowns, watching bloody Countdown. Lo are the mighty
fallen. But anyway, since I got hearing aids around ten years ago, I have
always tended not to put them in until after I have had breakfast. So we are
watching the television, and I can’t turn it up to a level at which I can hear
everything that is being said without deafening Linda. So I try to work it out
as best I can from a combination of lip-reading and watching the letters and
numbers on the boards. At the former, I am pretty rubbish. In particular, the
monologue from the guest and Susie Dent’s origins of words might as well be a
distant breaking of lemonade bottles. So there is an awful lot of asking Linda what
people on the box have just said. To her credit, Linda does not get angry at
this.
What’s the obvious solution? Put my blasted hearing aids in before
watching. Now I could argue that this would not be ideal as I might forget to take
them out before having my pre-breakfast shower, and consequently banjax them,
but that’s not the real reason for not wearing them. The real reason is that I
have just grown into the habit of not wearing them.
And how often have I broken a cup or plate because I always
put the washed and dried crockery back in the cupboard in a certain order,
despite that order not making sense? When typing on the computer, if I notice an
error, say, six or seven words back, I don’t click on it and correct it. I use
the back space, deleting everything I have typed since the error and type the
whole lot again. This illogical habit must date to the early 1980’s before we
had the pointy-clicky stuff.
I seem to recall my old pal Kevin Connelly talking about
this slavery to habit, noting that it is a very common feature of Samuel
Beckett’s fiction. I think Kevin actually wrote, or at least planned, a parody
which combined Beckett with Henning Mankell’s fictional detective, Inspector
Wallander.
Some of my drinking habits were moulded in the days when the
children were little, and there were fewer opportunities to go to the pub. Before
the kids, Linda and I went out together. Then came a time when we started
cocooning and staying in to watch a video over a bottle of wine and some nacho
chips. Then the kids came along and we hardly ever went out at all. However, if
I had to go an errand on my own, I would sneak into the pub on the way back and
have a surreptitious pint. From this, I learned that Linda can smell beer on me
across a fifty-acre field, and in any case she said she didn’t need to as I always
had a silly grin on my face if I had been for a pint. The point is that this
habit continued long after the kids had got older and I could go for a beer
whenever I wanted. Force of habit again.
I have stopped doing this now, as in recent months I have
tried to cut down on the booze. I still drink a blooming sight more than the
doctor would like. But then again, nobody asked her to like it.
2.
McGuffy’s Law
My dad used to refer to McGuffy’s Law much as everyone talks
of Murphy’s Law. For the most part, he meant exactly the same thing: if
something can go wrong, it will go wrong (hence the broken crockery in our
house due to my sticking to the same order of replacement in the cupboard).
However, he also used it to mean something else: that a process that works for
everyone else doesn’t work for you.
Warning: I am about to talk shop. Although retired now, I
still publish the occasional scientific paper, and I still act as cancer editor
for the Journal of Medical Screening. When a scientific paper is submitted to a
journal, the editor will send it out to other experts in the field who will
review it and hopefully spot mistakes and suggest improvements. These will then
be returned to the author, who will amend the paper and submit a revised
version. If the reviews are particularly damning, suggesting that the paper is
irremediable, the author will be told politely to stick it up his jazz drum.
When I, with my editor’s hat on, send a paper that has been
submitted to the JMS out to potential reviewers, they always say that they don’t
have time to look at the paper for me. I have sometimes asked twelve potential
reviewers before one consents. However, when I as an author submit a paper to a
journal, the picture is totally different. The editor seems to have no trouble
in finding half a dozen myopic nutters who then supply page after bloody page
of closely typed obsessive babble about my paper. It really gets on my nerves.
And I am sure my old man would have considered that an instance of McGuffy’s
law.
3.
Nostalgia
It only recently occurred to me that this year is the fortieth
anniversary of my stint working in Singapore. I was in my twenties and this was
very exciting for me. I first had to spend a couple of weeks in the International
Agency for Research on Cancer in Lyon, then fly from Lyon Satolas (now called
Lyon St Exupéry) to Paris Orly, and subsequently from Orly to Singapore, the
latter flight taking about eighteen hours. I enjoyed the flight. In those days,
economy class in Singapore Airlines was pretty luxurious. In 1985, there wasn’t
that much in the way of visual entertainment, but I listened to the various audio
options on the little earphones, including the jazz classics channel. The
material would probably be considered pretty corny nowadays, but there were two
numbers which I felt had real impact, East St Louis Toodle-Oo by Duke
Ellington in his sinuous jungle period, and Bix Beiderbecke’s Dixieland masterpiece,
Singin’ the Blues.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZnjJZLsfd0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ue9igC7flI
If I listen to either of these now, I am this young fellow back
there on the plane, looking out the window as we start our descent over Peninsular
Malaysia, mile after mile after mile of rain forest, and wondering what my next
few months in the far east will be like.
I may tell you about the more significant events of my time
in Singapore later, but for now, here is a very minor vignette from my first
couple of days there. We had had a momentous monsoon storm that day, with
rainfall of a ferocity I had never seen before. I was getting a taxi back to my
flat. The Chinese taxi driver said, ‘Have to go long way round. Because of
flooding.’
‘OK,’ I replied.
He wasn’t convinced that I had understood.
‘You know, flooding,’ he said.
‘Yes, OK,’ I answered. I wasn’t much of a conversationalist.
He was still far from persuaded that this dim-witted ang
mo had got the point.
‘You know,’ he said again, ‘Plenty water.’
The Singapore River in the 1980's. A vanished world.

Comments
Post a Comment